Bubbled Romney stumbles

Now, that’s what I’m talking about. I wrote after the Vice Presidential debate that it was the most entertaining debate I had ever watched, and I still think that is true, but last night would be a close second for sure. It was definitely the best debate performance that I have ever seen from Barack Obama, which, as I wrote before, is a lower bar than most people think.

There were a lot of good moments in this debate for the president, and maybe one or two for Romney, but even if Romney had been winning the entire debate (he wasn’t) this exchange would have sunk him:

Warning to all my co-workers: anyone who comes into my office today and starts speaking will be met with a steely glare and the words, “Please proceed, UI designer.”

Everything about this exchange was a win for Obama and a loss for Romney. It was only moments after the president accepted responsibility for the deaths of the ambassador and 3 other Americans, only moments after the president refused to throw Hillary Clinton under the bus, pointing out that the buck does indeed stop with him, only moments after he had already pointed out that Romney’s actions immediately following the attack were to try to score political points off an American tragedy.

A better politician, a better leader, would have recognized this as a moment to move on to the next question, but Romney thought he saw an opening, and decided to double down on a chance to use a tragedy to damage the president. Look how eagerly he approaches Candy Crowley to get his attack in. Look at the raised eyebrows as he demands confirmation from the president. Just nasty.

And then: “Please proceed, governor.”

Romney’s next words: “Ah bah ah bah dah.” Clearly rattled. Realizing, just a little late, that the president seems pretty confident about his position, and maybe, just maybe, wondering why. But too late, he was committed, and he blundered on, prompting the president to say, “get the transcript.”

And then Candy Crowley did something that journalists never seem to do. Seeing two men arguing about a point of fact, and one where she knew what the facts actually were, she settled the argument. The president did indeed say what he had claimed to say. The right wing was outraged! How dare she point out facts in a debate! That’s not her job, they complained. Facts have a liberal bias! The president says he said something; it’s on videotape. But: some disagree!

What happened to Romney is what happens when epistemic closure takes over a party. It is accepted dogma on the right wing that the president never said anything about terror when talking about the Libya attacks. That Rose Garden address wasn’t played over and over on FOX News, it wasn’t quoted on right wing blogs. In that bubbled universe, the president apologized for an unrelated video and covered up the terrorist angle. Mitt Romney, we learned last night, has been living in that bubbled universe with his supporters, and he got embarrassed on national television because of it.

Twenty days to go, folks. Let’s win this thing.

 

Author: Wiesman

Husband, father, video game developer, liberal, and perpetual Underdog.

2 thoughts on “Bubbled Romney stumbles”

  1. I agree completely that Romney stumbled on the Lybia “Act of Terror” debate kerfluffle. Republicans should always be prepared for a debate moderator to side with Democrats because the latter two share a worldview. 30 million or so TV viewers saw Crowley slam Romney with “facts” but only a million or so viewers saw her retraction an hour or so later. That hurts. On the other hand, anything that brings attention to the President’s missteps in Lybia is ok by me.

    1. She didn’t retract it an hour later. She repeated what she said in the debate, that Romney was right that for 14 days the Obama administration had talked about the video as being at least partially responsible for the Benghazi attack.

      Ivy, no one is denying that the Obama administration seemed to conflate the demonstrations in Cairo and other Middle East cities with the attack on the embassy. There were conflicting reports right from the beginning. Even some Libyans were saying the next day that they had thought the video may have been responsible for the attacks.

      What conservatives have falsely claimed is that Obama NEVER said anything about terror when talking about the situation, and that is why Romney looked bad last night. He lives in that conservative bubble where he only hears right wing talking points. He was shocked to find out that the president DID indeed talk about terror the next day.

      Yes, the president and his administration confused the situation by talking about BOTH terror AND the video that caused demonstrations in other cities. Yes, it was not handled perfectly. But Romney tried to turn this into an attack on the president based on a set of information that was NOT true and that’s why he looked bad. It wasn’t Candy Crowley’s fault that Romney was implying something that was untrue. It was Romney’s fault.

      Personal responsibility!

Disagree?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s